Skip to main content

This was posted as an OpEd on Fighting and we are trying to build up support for this concept. With all the talk but little action on support for the troops and vets, this is a solid proposal that could net enough money to seriously address the needs of vets. They have served their country courageously and they deserve more than window dressing to give them the care they deserve.

Please read the article by Brent Budowsky and help spread the word throughout the netroots. And take the unabashedly tilted poll.

Noel Schutz, Publisher Fighting
Randy Risener, Editor, Fighting Dems News Service

Lets Create A Soldier Bond As The Authentic Support For Troops, Vets and Military Families
Brent Budowsky
Contributing Editor,
Fighting Dems News Service

I have already begun urging Democrats from the high levels to the grassroots to initiate a Soldier Bond that would raise $500 billion dollars, over 20 years, to meet the needs of our troops, vets and military families.

The Soldier Bond would be structured similar to the U.S. Savings Bond, modelled after the War Bond of the 1940's, and the money would be used for the human, health, educational, financial, vocational and psychological needs of all troops, vets and their families.

The original legislation I propose is this: that Congress can pass by the 4th of July a plan to require two things:

First that the President consult with Wall Street leaders and present to Congress by September 1 specific options for an actionable Soldier Bond.

Second, that the executive and legislative branches immediately begin consultations with the full range of veteran's advocates and support groups to fully delineate the program needs, and honestly account for the costs of addressing them..

Every major group should have public input and veterans who served in World War Two, Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War I, Bosnia, and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars should all be part of the policy process and should all benefit from the Soldier's Bond.

I have discussed this concept with many veterans over the last month and I will promise that any program similiar to this would receive overwhelming, enthusiastic and deserved support from many tens of millions of Americans.

I will promise that if a Soldier's Bond is offered Americans everywhere would line up to buy it.

And I guaratee that if something such as this is not done, our young people will either be forced to assume this burden through a massive tax increase, or continue the neglect of our leadership generation today.

The Soldier Bond is about rising above politics and is structured to appeal to the universe of Americans in Washington and around the Nation, but I will make two political points.

First, I have concluded that the Democratic Congress is incapable of a coherent and principled, and effective position on the Iraq war so long as the President can claim, falsely, that Democrats do not support the troops, and Democrats, sadly, succomb to this false argument.

Second, Democrats and Republicans need to have heartfelt and honest conversations with themselves about why nearly 70% of America disapproves of all of them.

On the war policy itself, and the treatment of troops and vets, both parties share major responsibility. The issue is not who can claim bragging rights to the status quo, but who will set the standard for the future.

What Democrats and Republicans do not get, is that for voters who feel passionately pro or con the Iraq war, and for voters who feel passionately that we must do far more for our troops and vets, these are the most educated and informed voters in the history of America.

These voters cannot be fooled and should not be insulted by talking point flim flam, written by party consultants, repeated by elected officials.

Patriotic and concerned voters, who care passionately about these matters see through this instantly. When Americans disapprove of policies, parties or institutions and receive this self-congratulatory propaganda and even worse, solicitatons for money based on this propaganda, they become even more angry, alienated and disillusoned.

That is why 50% disapproval became 60%, and now in some polls 70% or more. And this skyrocketing disapproval has reached the Democratic Congress as well as the Republican President. Yet propaganda continues to flow while public discontent rises to levels dangerousto a democracy, and destructive to any party or candidate who talks down to our people.

Here is an alternative: show leadership, tell the truth, and the public will join us. Aspire to the Gold Standard for supporting troops, vets and military families and a hundred milllion Americans and more, will applaud it, and support it.

It is derelict and sick that the Marine Corps urgently seeks assistance that they regard as life saving in 2005 and even this is insulted and ignored by those who claim to support the troops.

It is derelict and sick that troops continue to die preventable deaths because of lack of support from Washington. It is derelict and sick that hundreds of thousands of our vets are homeless, that wounded troops continue to suffer indignity and pain because of lack of attention and support when they return home.

It is derelict and sick that disabled heroes suffer further indignities tolerated by those who claim to support them; that veteran centers are overloaded and underfunded; that mental health treatment is so far behind the long term need; and that this happens while our political markets dish out talking points that nobody believes, while our Dow Jones market reaches record highs, and our politicians enact tax cuts while these derelictions continue.

These are not matters of philosophical or partisan disagreements. These are matters of fundamental national honor that we send our young to war, subject them to this lack of support, dump talking points on American families, and wonder wonder why 70% of them disapprove of virtually every institution, including both parties, in Washington.

The Soldier Bond will be a major part of the moral, military, patriotic and political solution because it represents an honorable, powerful, gold standard, red, white and blue support for our troops, vets and military families.

The $500 billion dollar, 20 year package is based on conservative projections of long term needs that have come from diverse sources. These needs are currently unmet, unplanned and unbudgeted. Whether one supports or opposes the war policy they rise every hour the policy continues, and every day these problems are not addressed.

One great benefit of bringing, empowering and publicizing the involvement of all groups representing veterans, troops and military families is that we will refine the exact program needs and cost while we create a national consensus to act.

The Soldier Bond would finance those needs that are human, health, financial and other matters that could receive near universal support from the political community and the broad base of the American people.

This would be voluntary; no person is forced to buy the bond. Mark my words, if this is not done, many will be forced to ultimately pay far higher taxes if we shamelessly dump these obligations on our children.

It is time politicians recognize that America is a great and noble country, with a great and noble people, who yearn to be asked what they can do for our country, and would line up in droves, to do it.

Long term, we have at least a $500 to $750 billion problem and the gold standard for true integrity and patriotism is a $500 to 750 billion solution.

The Soldier Bond will not need talking points; just tell the truth, call the Nation to action, and the Nation will respond.

We Americans live in a blessed land we love. The Soldier Bond will give every American the opportunity to share the patriotic bond with those who give us the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Lets honor the American people by giving everyone a chance to serve. To prove our pride in those who wear the uniform. To prove our patriotism by doing our duty, To prove our Americanism by reminding each other that we are a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people and that on this matter, we the people are in this together.

Originally posted to Fighting Dem Vets on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 05:35 PM PDT.


Do you thing that a Soldier Bond is a worthwhile initiative?

100%19 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes

| 19 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  This concept goes to the heart of (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    oceanview, irishwitch, godislove

    SUPPORT THE TROOPS. We need to walk the walk not just talk the talk.

    •  Boy, this troubles me (0+ / 0-)

      I believe that the US Government when it contracts with each enlistee has a simple contract that needs to enforced.  It is should be the government's obligation to provide for that soldier / veteran's health care without charge for the rest of his/her life.

      Veterans are costly creatures to create and maintain.  The Government should refrain from wanting to create Veterans.  Harnessed with a 500 billion dollar debt, future administrations will think twice before resorting to war.

      The one missing link is that Veterans have not had fair access to the legal system.  With newly enacted legislation that link may now be in place.

      Your proposal shifts the burden to the backs of the very people who serve.  

      Attn: James Nicholson is still Sec. of VA. There is no excuse for that. Thankyouverymuch

      by llbear on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 06:29:17 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I think this is the same concept as (0+ / 0-)

        savings bonds in WWII. How does this shift the burden on the vets? I don't quite understand your point. Though I understand your concern.

        •  Who will buy those bonds? (0+ / 0-)

          It won't be major bond purchasers.  It will be the same good people who send their children off to serve their country.

          $500 billion is a bundle - and those who have wanted this war and profited from it should be taxed to pay for the effects of it.

          Attn: James Nicholson is still Sec. of VA. There is no excuse for that. Thankyouverymuch

          by llbear on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 06:44:34 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Here is Brent replying to make it clear. (0+ / 0-)

            I am posting on his behalf. This should make it clear.

            It is a voluntarily assumed burden by patriotic
            Americans who support the vets and buy the
            bonds.  The vets don't pay anything, they
            benefit from the bond, it's the people who
            support the vets that buy the bond.....

            Those who buy the bond, BTW, make a little
            interest like a Savings Bond...and the cost to
            the government is minuscule compared to
            paying for these programs and services
            through government spending, usually paid
            for with tax increases, because with gov't
            spending without the bond, the government
            pays the principle and the interest......

            I've discussed this on the Air Americans, their
            prime time show, on Ed Shuttz when Tony
            Trupiano was guest hosting, on Tony's show,
            on INN television, and today on a nice show
            in Minnesota It's A Village and the reaction
            I get is electric......and this all came to me
            from word of mouth, I didn't solicit these

            It's a mouthful for people to swallow who
            aren't keyed into this, but once they get it,
            they get it big.....

            Brent Budowsky

            •  The problems arise (0+ / 0-)

              when no one buys the bonds.  It's a cyclical thing. Right now, bond sales will do pretty well.  You might even get pension funds investing.

              When the wheel slowly turns back to indifference - it always does - where will we be then?

              God knows the VA needs the money. I hope you are right if this goes forward.  I know you've put lots into it. But, I'm afraid I'm right.

              Attn: James Nicholson is still Sec. of VA. There is no excuse for that. Thankyouverymuch

              by llbear on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 09:44:01 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

          •  IIbear is right but the people who profited from (0+ / 0-)

            this abomination like Cheney and his Halliburton stock and W and his inheritance from Poppy's Carlyle Group's blood money are not going to support these troop once they try to build their civilian. And if the rest of us don't do something like this then 35 years down the road it'll be like now where a lot of the men wounded 35 years ago are either dead from too few services or living in somewhat degraded conditions after a needlessly difficult life.

            FOX NEWS viewers: Ignorant before watching, stupid after watching.

            by OHdog on Mon Jun 04, 2007 at 08:16:40 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

  •  We need this initiative. (0+ / 0-)

    It is important that the Fighting Dems and the Democrats have taken the initiative on this issue. We have been at war in Iraq longer than in SS II and our soldiers have in many cases seen harder duty than in Vietnam, Korea or WW II. Still they are an afterthought in the minds of the Dungeons & Dragons warriors who sent them into harms way.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site